Baker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under former AS § 12.55.025(e), “where the sentencing judge has discretion to impose concurrent sentences, [the -1- judge] should make findings to justify the imposition of a consecutive sentence” (citations omitted)
• assuming, but declining to decide, whether the defendant’s consent to the continuance was required to exclude time under Rule 45(d)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paige v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-06-17· cited 10×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-05-02· cited 2×
• Jeremiah Miguel Perez v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2022-11-18· cited 2×
• Alaska Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-05-19

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marks v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1972-04-21· cited 144×
• State v. Andrews
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 142×
• State v. Andrews
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1986-08-08· cited 92×
• Whittlesey v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-11-28· cited 38×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-04-19· cited 36×
• Wells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-10-11· cited 20×
• Griffith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-01-13· cited 18×
• Pusich v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-11-24· cited 17×
• Puzewicz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-08-06· cited 13×
• State v. Jeske
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-12-20· cited 11×
• Graybill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-12-20· cited 10×
• Figueroa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-10-19· cited 10×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-08-24· cited 4×