S.D. New York· 6/30/1970
Wellington Computer Graphics, Inc. v. Modell
Citations
- 315 F. Supp. 24
- 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In effect defendants are claiming that being forced to appear in New York City rather than Newark, New Jersey—cities twelve miles apart—so substantially inconveniences them that plaintiff should be deprived of its choice of forum. The contention is frivolous.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacMAHON
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schwartz v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.E.D. New York· 2002-02-23· cited 24×
- Lewis v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co.S.D. New York· 1973-11-05· cited 11×
- US Industries, Inc. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYS.D. New York· 1972-06-09· cited 9×
- Habrout v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2001-06-04· cited 9×
- Smith v. Guaranty Service Corp.N.D. California· 1970-12-30· cited 8×
- Vernitron Corp. v. BenjaminS.D. New York· 1970-07-27· cited 4×
- ESSEX SYSTEMS COMPANY v. SteinbergS.D. New York· 1971-12-16· cited 2×
- Tarasi v. Pittsburgh National BankAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1978-04-04· cited 1×
- In Re Eastern Dist. Repetitive Stress Injury Lit.E.D. New York· 1994-04-20
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 896×
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court· 1943-11-08· cited 693×
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 647×
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court· 1943-05-24· cited 645×
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Second Circuit· 1950-05-08· cited 265×
- Walter J. Kohler v. Kohler Co., a Corporation, Herbert v. Kohler, Ernst & Ernst, a Partnership, and Paul F. JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 1963-06-26· cited 167×
- Manuel M. Ellis v. Victor Carter, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1961-05-31· cited 159×
- Martin v. CreasySupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 136×
- Mottolese v. KaufmanSecond Circuit· 1949-07-06· cited 106×
- J. E. Stevens v. Hollie VowellTenth Circuit· 1965-03-16· cited 87×
- Ina Frankel Abramson, Irving Hellman and Beatrice Hellman v. Pennwood Investment Corp., and Edward Nathan, Intervenor-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1968-04-09· cited 69×
- Mary B. Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisThird Circuit· 1968-01-15· cited 66×
- Ferguson v. TabahSecond Circuit· 1961-04-13· cited 66×
- Connelly v. BalkwillN.D. Ohio· 1959-04-08· cited 47×
- Jenkins v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.S.D. New York· 1952-04-29· cited 41×
- Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisW.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-03-23· cited 31×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Beryllium & Oil Corp.S.D. New York· 1969-06-25· cited 26×
- Schmidt v. American Flyers Airline Corp.S.D. New York· 1966-11-16· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.