Schmidt v. American Flyers Airline Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that corporate defendant would not suffer any “oppressive or unusual expense or inconvenience” in transporting its own employees to New York, where it does business; but plaintiff and her husband, as “persons of modest means,” “certainly cannot match resources with defendant”
• “We are not convinced that defendant would suffer any oppressive or unusual expense or inconvenience in transporting its own employees to New York, where it does business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).