· 3/16/1965
J. E. Stevens v. Hollie Vowell
Citations
- 343 F.2d 374
- 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In a Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 context, the court stated that “Rule 9(b) requiring the pleading of fraud with particularity, is not applicable in this case, even assuming that the question was properly raised below.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murrah, Breitenstein, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.