Skip to main content
· 3/16/1965

J. E. Stevens v. Hollie Vowell

Citations

  • 343 F.2d 374
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In a Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 context, the court stated that “Rule 9(b) requiring the pleading of fraud with particularity, is not applicable in this case, even assuming that the question was properly raised below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murrah, Breitenstein, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.