S.D. Ohio· 1/30/1981
Welch v. Falke
Citations
- 507 F. Supp. 264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact that conviction rendered petitioner ineligible for record expungement not sufficient to render “in custody” for purposes of habeas review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,591×
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 1,503×
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court· 1973-04-18· cited 742×
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-12-09· cited 506×
- Wales v. WhitneySupreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 281×
- Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court· 1951-01-02· cited 269×
- Coffin v. ReichardSixth Circuit· 1944-07-03· cited 154×
- Harvey v. South DakotaEighth Circuit· 1975-12-11· cited 27×
- Glover v. State of North CarolinaE.D. North Carolina· 1969-07-02· cited 8×
Other cases named Welch v. Falke
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.