Skip to main content
· 5/30/2013

Weinstein v. Fox

Citations

  • 129 Nev. 377
  • 302 P.3d 1137
  • 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 39
  • 2013 WL 2364195
  • 2013 Nev. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that NRS 21.090 protects the debtor's privilege to enjoy the necessary comforts of life, \while doing as little injury as possible to the creditor\ (internal marks omitted
  • in construing exemption statute the court must 11 neither depart from the statutory language nor extend the 12 legislative grant
  • in construing exemption statute the court must 11 neither depart from the statutory language nor extend the 12 legislative grant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Pickering, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.