· 12/28/2006
Christensen v. Pack
Citations
- 149 P.3d 40
- 122 Nev. 1309
- 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 111
- 2006 Nev. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that exempt funds commingled with nonexempt funds retain the exempt status \so long as tracing is possible\
- commingling does not destroy the exemption as long as tracing is possible
- ownership over funds stays unchanged even when commingled with other funds \so long as tracing is possible\
- ownership over funds stays unchanged even when commingled with other funds \so long as tracing is possible\
- ownership over funds stays unchanged even when commingled with other funds \so long as tracing is possible\
- “We liberally and beneficially construe our state exemption statutes in favor of the debtor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Becker, Gibbons, Douglas, Hardesty, Parraguirre
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.