Hardy Companies, Inc. v. SNMARK, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts do not presume a legislative intent to overturn long-established principles of law, unless expressly declared or necessarily implied
• holding that the notice requirement for a mechanic's lien is satisfied if the landowner had actual notice and is not prejudiced
• explaining that statutory construction issues are “ ‘questions] of law that this court reviews de novo’ ” (quoting A.F. Constr. Co. v. Virgin River Casino, 118 Nev. 699, 703, 56 P.3d 887, 890 (2002))
• recognizing that \Fondren is still good law\
• concluding that NRS 108.2453(1) is ambiguous
• discussing purpose of pre-lien notice and a lien claimant's affirmative duty of due diligence in providing proper notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).