Weinberg v. Sun Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff bringing an action under the UTPCPL must prove the common law fraud elements of reliance and causation with respect to all subsections of the UTPCPL
• holding that private UTPCPL claim included individual questions of fact and could not be certified
• holding that statutory damages are unavailable under the UTPCPL in the absence of an ascertainable loss of money or property proximately caused by the defendant’s prohibited conduct.
• stating that the plaintiff in that case “must allege reliance, that he purchased Ultra® because he heard and believed Sunoco’s false advertising ” (emphasis added)
• noting that a UTPCPL plaintiff must demonstrate that he justifiably relied on the defendant’s deceptive practice and that he suffered harm as a result of that reliance
• stating that the plaintiff in that case “must allege reliance, that he purchased Ultra® because he heard and believed Sunoco’s false advertising” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).