Seldon v. Home Loan Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• choosing not to follow Superior Court view of post-amendment catchall section because court’s case law did not discuss or recognize changes to law, specifically addition of “deceptive conduct” to statute
• choosing not to follow Superior Court view of post-amendment catchall section because court’s case law did not discuss or recognize changes to law, specifically addition of “deceptive conduct” to statute
• dismissing the plaintiffs' TILA claim where the Federal Truth-in-Lending form signed by the plaintiffs listed the annual percentage rate and described it as \[t]he cost of your credit as a yearly rate\
• noting UTPCPL claims “fail[ed] for lack of any supporting factual allegations”
• to prove justifiable reliance, a plaintiff must allege that “he justifiably bought the product in the first place ... because of the ... misrepresentation or deceptive conduct.”
• “[I]f a plaintiff alleges deceptive conduct, a plaintiff need not allege the elements of common law fraud, but, conversely, must do so if a plaintiff alleges fraudulent conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).