Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/4/1995

Weidenbacher v. Duclos

Citations

234 Conn. 51
661 A.2d 988
1995 Conn. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the best interest of the child is a paramount consideration in determining whether to order blood tests
recognizing that the best interest of the child is a paramount consideration in determining whether to order blood tests
emphasizing that person must be “biological or adoptive [parent]” or “ ‘legal guardian’ ” to have standing to pursue habeas corpus proceeding for child custody
relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge custody of child at common law
relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge custody of child at common law
permitting putative biological father to maintain standing for habeas action seeking custody and visitation of minor child bom to mother while married to another man

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Weidenbacher v. Duclos

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.