Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/24/2004
Evans v. Wilson
Citations
- 856 A.2d 679
- 382 Md. 614
- 2004 Md. LEXIS 502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[O]ne of the purposes of the paternity act is to promote the general welfare and best interests of children born out of wedlock.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis in original)
- “[O]ne of the purposes of the paternity act is to promote the general welfare and best interests of children born out of wedlock.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia, Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sieglein v. SchmidtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-25· cited 14×
- Ashley v. MattinglyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-13· cited 12×
- Kamp v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-09-21· cited 9×
- Sieglein v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-20· cited 9×
- Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2009-10-13· cited 6×
- In Re KATERINE L. and Alex F.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-03· cited 6×
- In re: Adoption/G'ship of B.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-30· cited 4×
- Corbett v. MulliganCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-30· cited 2×
- Mulligan v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-23
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,333×
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 719×
- Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-09· cited 143×
- Petrini v. PetriniCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-25· cited 102×
- Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-28· cited 98×
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-16· cited 98×
- In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-05· cited 96×
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-07· cited 79×
- In Re KHMichigan Supreme Court· 2004-04-14· cited 78×
- Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-30· cited 78×
- R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-08-11· cited 74×
- Weidenbacher v. DuclosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-04· cited 71×
- C.C. v. A.B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-02-21· cited 70×
- Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-07· cited 69×
- Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-18· cited 67×
- Voishan v. PalmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-22· cited 61×
- In Re Adoption No. A91-71ACourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-05-09· cited 55×
- Monroe v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-26· cited 54×
- Ban v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-10-31· cited 48×
- Ivy v. HarringtonMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.