Skip to main content

State v. Allen Tercero

Citations

  • 467 S.W.3d 1
  • 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 3284
  • 2015 WL 1544519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s good faith belief that Transportation Code permitted nonconsensual, war-rantless blood draw “is irrelevant” to whether blood-draw results should be suppressed under Fourth Amendment
  • holding officer's drawing of blood without a warrant was not an objectively reasonable mistake of law because a nonconsensual blood draw violated Tercero's Fourth Amendment rights
  • declining to apply Heien’s “reasonable mistake of law” exception to mandatory blood draw procedure because it was “inconsistent with the text of article 38.23”
  • declining to adopt Heien 42 as an exception to a state rule of procedure that prohibited admission of evidence obtained unconstitutionally
  • declining to recognize “reasonable mistake of law” federal good faith exception to Texas exclusionary rule because federal exception was “inconsistent with the text of article 38.23”
  • declining to recognize “reasonable mistake of law” federal good faith exception to Texas exclusionary rule because federal exception was “inconsistent with the text of article 38.23”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keyes, Bland, Massengale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Allen Tercero

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.