Skip to main content

Watts v. Watts

Citations

  • 405 N.W.2d 305
  • 137 Wis. 2d 506
  • 1987 Wisc. LEXIS 656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that unjust enrichment is a \theory of recovery\ and describing it as a stand-alone cause of action
  • recognizing common law property and contract action between unmarried cohabitants
  • noting that there is no common law marriage in Wisconsin
  • noting that there is no common law marriage in Wisconsin
  • contract claim by one cohabitant against the other must rest on consideration independent of the sexual relationship
  • \unmarried cohabitants may raise claims based upon unjust enrichment following the termination of their relationships.\ [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shirley S. Abrahamson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Watts v. Watts

55 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.