Aehegma v. Aehegma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cohabitation alone does not prove express agreement for equitable division of separate property acquired or improved during cohabitation
• holding that cohabitation alone does not prove express agreement for equitable division of separate property acquired or improved during cohabitation
• “Cohabitation, no matter for how long, does not by itself prove the existence of a contract implied-in-fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).