Harman v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ”[i]n deciding whether a partnership has been created by tacit agreement, courts must examine the facts to determine whether the parties carried on as co-owners of a business for profit”
• stating that “[ i ]n deciding whether a partnership has been created by tacit agreement, courts must examine the facts to determine whether the parties carried on as co-owners of a business for profit”
• implied contract claim fails where plaintiff failed to sustain burden of showing mutual expectation of payment
• plaintiff who ran day-to-day operations of a store for cohabitant due restitution for efforts
• “When findings of fact are requested by a party, as plaintiff did here, the trial court must make findings upon all material issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence.”
• partnership may be created by “tacit agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).