Skip to main content

Watters v. Dinn

Citations

  • 666 N.E.2d 433
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 765
  • 1996 WL 297559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether a particular statement is relevant and pertinent to the litigation is purely a legal determination for the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Robertson, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.