Ledbetter v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single telephone call, involving no threats or abusive language, cannot as a matter of law be the basis for the tort of invasion of privacy by intrusion
• finding no IIED where the “facts reveal[ed] only that [the defendant] communicated information which [the plaintiff’s] insurance company apparently provided him without her permission”
• discussing the plaintiff’s claim of invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts related to the transmission of confidential information and holding that the plaintiff failed to allege there was a public disclosure of the facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).