Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/1/2006
Watson v. Watson
Citations
- 272 Neb. 647
- 724 N.W.2d 24
- 2006 Neb. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In appellate proceedings, the examination by the appellate court is confined to questions which have been determined by the trial court.”
- decision to decline jurisdiction under the UCCJEA on an inconvenient forum basis is \entrusted to the discretion of the trial court\
- stat- ing jurisdiction over child custody proceedings is governed by UCCJEA
- stating jurisdiction over child custody proceedings is governed by UCCJEA
- “After a court of this state has declined to exercise its jurisdiction under the [Uniform Act], the objecting party is entitled to know that the trial court has engaged in a proper consideration of ‘all relevant factors’ and to a record that allows for meaningful appellate review.”
- official comment to § 110
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Hendry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court· 2008-03-05· cited 107×
- Bailey v. First Nat. Bank of ChadronNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-11-13· cited 96×
- Carter v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-12-05· cited 80×
- Knapp v. Village of Beaver CityNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-03-02· cited 40×
- Griffith v. TresselNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-06-25· cited 33×
- Miller v. MathiasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-27· cited 23×
- Wolter v. FortunaNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-04-30· cited 22×
- SUSAN L. v. Steven L.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2007-02-02· cited 15×
- In re the Parental Responsibilities of L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-06-27· cited 14×
- Plummer v. PlummerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-01-22· cited 11×
- In re Guardianship of S.T.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-05-25· cited 6×
- Bryant v. BryantNebraska Court of Appeals· 2020-05-12· cited 6×
- NB v. GAHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2014-05-23· cited 6×
- Ekaterina Nicholaevna Pokrovskaya, a/k/a Yekaterina Pokrovskaia v. Eric Van Genderen Sr.Wyoming Supreme Court· 2021-05-17· cited 5×
- Damrow v. MurdochNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-09-04· cited 4×
- In the Matter of Eric McAndrews and Sachet WoodsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-08-10· cited 4×
- Hubert v. CarmonyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-06-22· cited 4×
- In re Guardianship of Tomas J.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2025-02-28· cited 4×
- Hogan v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-02-12· cited 3×
- Ieasha Hipps v. Ruben CabreraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-09-28· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 81×
- In Re Estate of RossoNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-07-29· cited 57×
- Curran v. BuserNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-31· cited 42×
- Grahm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-09-28· cited 18×
- Shanoski v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-10-02· cited 16×
- White v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-02-03· cited 16×
- Vannatta v. BouldsMontana Supreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 12×
- In Re Interest of Floyd B.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-04-10· cited 12×
- Troshynski v. Nebraska State Board of Public AccountancyNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-08-05· cited 11×
- Lamb v. LambNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-12-20· cited 8×
- Seamans v. SeamansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-02-28· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.