Griffith v. Tressel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that subject matter jurisdiction was not determined by the parties' agreement to designate New Jersey as the child's home state
• noting that \[t]he question whether the requisite 'significant connection' remains is fact specific\
• finding a significant connection where the father resided in New Jersey and the child spent at least 20 percent of each year in New Jersey
• outlining the analysis a court must use to determine its jurisdiction to modify a child custody determination
• collecting cases that assess “significant connection” by examining (Footnote Continued Next Page
• jurisdiction is not lost under this provision \so long as there is either a 'significant connection' or 'substantial evidence'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).