Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Grahm v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 270
  • 132 Cal. App. 4th 1193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that California retained jurisdiction because one parent who still exercised visitation rights lived there
  • concluding that the provision of California's UCCJEA defining the circumstances under which exclusive, con tinuing jurisdiction is lost, which is identical to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-66a(1), must be construed in accordance with Kumar
  • finding adequate connection based on parenting time during the summer and alternating holidays and noting that there is a \significant connection\ so long as the remaining parent continues to assert and exercise visitation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.