Skip to main content

Watson v. JC Penney Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 605 N.E.2d 723
  • 237 Ill. App. 3d 976
  • 178 Ill. Dec. 929
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 2064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff should address his argument regarding an “antiquated” rule of law to the legislature
  • noting that the plaintiff should address his argument regarding an \antiquated\ rule of law to the legislature
  • explaining that if the sixty-year-old natural accumulations rule is to be overruled, it should be by the Illinois legislature or the Supreme Court of Illinois
  • up to the legislature to make a change in the natural accumulation rule
  • this court stated that the plaintiff’s request to overrule the natural-accumulation rule should be addressed “to the legislature, which formulates the public policy of this State and which could change this ‘antiquated rule’ if it wished”
  • up to the legislature to make a change in the natural accumulation rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.