Kremer v. Carr's Food Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether the defendant used reasonable care in trying to prevent a danger “will depend on the particular variables of each case” and is for the jury to decide
• rejecting application of natural accumulation rule to grocery store parking lot and applying the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 instead
• declining to extend the rule for sidewalks to business premises and explaining the numerous miles of sidewalks would make it an impossible task to remove all of the snow and ice in a timely manner
• relying on Restatement to reject the natural accumulation rule
• relying on Restatement to reject the natural accumulation rule
• relying on Restatement to reject the natural -20- accumulation rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).