Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]onduct of the invitee will often be relevant in the context of contributory negligence.”
• “[C]onduct of the invitee will often be relevant in the context of contributory negligence.”
• “[C]onduct of the invitee will often be relevant in the context of contributory negligence.”
• “This ‘loaning’ gives a quantum of ‘control and possession’ to another party.”
• “With the axiom being that the duty is to protect invitees from unreasonable risks of harm, the underlying principle is that even though invitors have a duty to exercise reasonable care in protecting their invitees, they are not absolute insurers of the safety of their invitees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).