Watkins v. Trans Union, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jurisdictional grant of S.823 was concurrent: actions could be brought “in any appropriate United States district court, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction.” 116 Cong.Rec. 32641 (1970
• “ Not only does the legislative 13 history lack an expression of intent to affect the concurrent jurisdiction by granting defendants the ability to remove well-pleaded complaints, it indicates that Congress explicitly contemplated state courts entertaining FCRA actions.”
• “Congress explicitly contemplated state courts entertaining FCRA actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).