Skip to main content
· 3/24/1983

Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of Grayslake

Citations

  • 703 F.2d 252
  • 68 A.L.R. Fed. 674
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that for a screening arrangement to be effective, it must be “set up at the time when the potentially disqualifying event occurred”
  • screens instituted only at time of motion to 15 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO disqualify were too late despite attorney’s affidavit that he had shared no information with new firm
  • “If the attorney can clearly and persuasively show that he was not privy to the confidences and secrets of the client, a court will not be held to have abused its discretion in concluding that disqualification is unnecessary[.]”
  • describing other approved screening mechanisms
  • describing other approved screening mechanisms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell, Cudahy, Bonsal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.