Skip to main content
· 3/31/1976

Charles B. Cannon v. U. S. Acoustics Corporation

Citations

  • 532 F.2d 1118
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellants could not complain of faulty procedures used by the trial court, because “[e]ven if these claims were meritorious, and we think they are not, they cannot bé urged on appeal because none of the points of error was presented to the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Cummings, Bauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.