Skip to main content

Watkins v. State

Citations

  • 516 So. 2d 1043
  • 1987 WL 2666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that communication regarding trial dates was not privileged because it was not intended to not be disclosed to third parties
  • holding - 22 - that communication regarding trial dates was not privileged because it was not intended to not be disclosed to third parties
  • finding non-privileged an attorney letter advising the client of trial dates
  • finding non-privileged attorney’s testimony regarding advising client of trial dates
  • illegality of judgment and sentence for attempted uttering acknowledged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wigginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.