Skip to main content
· 12/19/1995

Kilbourne & Sons v. Kilbourne

Citations

  • 677 So. 2d 855
  • 1995 WL 746378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the JCC’s determination of MMI, which was based on his own review of the medical records, did not comport with the legal definition of MMI
  • finding non-privileged an attorney letter to a client where the attorney merely recited language from a relevant statute
  • finding non-privileged attorney communication to client reciting statutory language and advising of statutory work search requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.