Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 771 S.W.2d 537
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that, although testimony was improper bolstering, it was harmless in light of the additional evidence of appellant’s guilt
  • holding no prejudice shown where evidence of guilt was overwhelming
  • even if counsel’s failure to object was outside the range of professional competent assistance, overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt made this error harmless
  • even if counsel’s failure to object was outside the range of professional competent assistance, overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt made this error harmless
  • even if counsel = s failure to object was outside the range of professional competent assistance, overwhelming evidence of defendant = s guilt made this error harmless
  • even if counsel = s failure to object was outside the range of professional competent assistance, overwhelming evidence of defendant = s guilt made this error harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Duncan, McCormick, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.