E.D. Arkansas· 5/13/1996
Warner v. United States
Citations
- 926 F. Supp. 1387
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7308
- 1996 WL 242889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that double jeopardy and due process preclude a district court from resentencing on counts already fully served
- holding that Constitution and court’s jurisdiction allow for two-level increase on resentencing
- applying Bailey retroactively and finding no procedural bar to such application in § 2255 action
- due process prevents a court from resentencing a defendant who had completely served a term of imprisonment
- expectation of finality in fully served drug term
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eisele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richard Gerry Drinkard v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1996-10-07· cited 372×
- United States v. Barry Davis, A/K/A \Mark Johnson\Third Circuit· 1997-04-23· cited 170×
- United States v. Charles H. Harrison, Jr., Also Known as ChuckEighth Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 148×
- United States v. Mister T. HillaryFourth Circuit· 1997-02-14· cited 116×
- United States v. Johnny Eugene SmithFourth Circuit· 1997-05-30· cited 68×
- United States v. BenbrookFifth Circuit· 1997-08-01· cited 41×
- United States v. Jose Ramon Gordils and Nicholas Mpounas, Gregory Melendez and Francisco BastarSecond Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 37×
- United States v. John David Easterling, A.K.A. Donald Ray DoyleTenth Circuit· 1998-10-07· cited 31×
- Rodriguez v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1996-06-26· cited 27×
- Merritt v. United StatesE.D. North Carolina· 1996-06-21· cited 25×
- Leavitt v. AraveD. Idaho· 1996-05-31· cited 20×
- Alton v. United StatesE.D. Missouri· 1996-06-03· cited 17×
- Satcher v. NetherlandE.D. Virginia· 1996-10-08· cited 15×
- United States v. James AltonEighth Circuit· 1997-07-14· cited 14×
- Woodhouse v. United StatesC.D. Illinois· 1996-07-26· cited 12×
- Johnston v. LoveE.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-07-22· cited 12×
- United States v. Cota-LoaizaD. Colorado· 1996-07-16· cited 9×
- Thayer v. United StatesE.D. Michigan· 1996-08-30· cited 9×
- Dossett v. United StatesD. South Dakota· 1996-06-20· cited 9×
- Scott v. AndersonN.D. Ohio· 1997-03-07· cited 8×
Cites
78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 1,809×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,750×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-02-28· cited 656×
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-02-17· cited 614×
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 434×
- Robert Flieger v. Paul K. Delo, SuperintendentEighth Circuit· 1994-04-07· cited 239×
- United States v. Charles ShueSeventh Circuit· 1987-06-30· cited 224×
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoFirst Circuit· 1989-04-28· cited 208×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.