Skip to main content
E.D. Arkansas· 5/13/1996

Warner v. United States

Citations

  • 926 F. Supp. 1387
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7308
  • 1996 WL 242889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that double jeopardy and due process preclude a district court from resentencing on counts already fully served
  • holding that Constitution and court’s jurisdiction allow for two-level increase on resentencing
  • applying Bailey retroactively and finding no procedural bar to such application in § 2255 action
  • due process prevents a court from resentencing a defendant who had completely served a term of imprisonment
  • expectation of finality in fully served drug term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eisele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.