Leavitt v. Arave

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the AEDPA’s provisions governing habeas corpus proceedings in capital eases do not raise a retroactivity problem
• finding that Congress intended the entire Act to take retroactive effect despite the omission of such statements as to the Chapter 153 amendments
• applying Landgraf analysis in determination that the amended versions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2253, and 2254 apply to cases pending in federal court on the date of enactment
• applying the AEDPA to a habeas petition pending since January 22, 1993
• finding congressional intent to apply the amendments retroactively in non-capital cases
• Chapter 154 needed an effective date provision to prevent the inference from the opt-in requirements that it only applied to future cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, Superintendent
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 516×
• Ronald Bernard Bennett v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
  Fourth Circuit· 1996-08-20· cited 172×
• Powell v. Jennifer
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-08-22· cited 27×
• Satcher v. Netherland
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-10-08· cited 15×
• Ehinger v. Miller
  S.D. New York· 1996-10-09· cited 13×
• Perez v. Marshall
  S.D. California· 1996-10-07· cited 13×
• Banks v. Horn
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-08-30· cited 8×
• Mackall v. Murray
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 8×
• Love v. Morton
  D. New Jersey· 1996-11-12· cited 6×
• Gentry v. Trippett
  E.D. Michigan· 1997-02-27· cited 4×
• Griffin v. Endicott
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1996-09-13· cited 4×
• Brewer v. Marshall
  D. Massachusetts· 1996-08-13· cited 3×
• Williams v. Cain
  W.D. Louisiana· 1996-10-09· cited 2×
• Duncan v. Calderon
  C.D. California· 1996-11-27· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Landgraf v. USI Film Products
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
• Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 3,788×
• Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston
  Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
• Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,050×
• Peyton v. Rowe
  Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 902×
• Erlenbaugh v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-12· cited 341×
• Alcaraz v. Block
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-11-02· cited 160×
• United States v. Jose Luis Castro, Alberto Duque, Gaston Pereira, Jaime Bayon, Defendants
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-02-08· cited 89×
• Warner v. United States
  E.D. Arkansas· 1996-05-13· cited 61×
• Ellis Wayne Felker v. Tony Turpin, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-05-02· cited 60×
• Houchin v. Zavaras
  D. Colorado· 1996-05-01· cited 14×