Skip to main content

Coleman v. Coleman

Citations

  • 864 So. 2d 371
  • 2003 WL 21040172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing § 30-3A-201 in the context of a wife's argument that her husband had the necessary \minimum contacts\ to subject him to in personam jurisdiction in Alabama

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.