Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/24/2009
Ware v. State
Citations
- 983 A.2d 853
- 118 Conn. App. 65
- 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 501
- 107 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that waiver of state’s sovereign immunity under Fair Employment Practices Act does not extend to punitive damages because different policy considerations apply to state than to private actors
- reversing trial court’s judgment denying defendant’s motion to dismiss portions of counts contained in plaintiffs complaint on basis of sovereign immunity
- reversing trial court’s judgment denying defendant’s motion to dismiss portions of counts contained in plaintiff’s com- plaint on basis of sovereign immunity
- considering whether plaintiff had exhausted HWE “claim” that was not styled as a separate cause of action but was “in the context of recognized causes of action”
- declining to address whether § 46a-104 authorizes punitive damages against private party
- denial of motion to dismiss based on colorable claim of sovereign immunity immediately appealable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavine, Beach, Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BialobrzeskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-09-21· cited 14×
- Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-05-22· cited 8×
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-04-26· cited 8×
- LaSALLE BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. BialobrzeskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-09-21· cited 6×
- Aldin Associates Ltd. Partnership v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-01-11· cited 6×
- Paragon Construction Co. v. Department of Public WorksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-19· cited 4×
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-05-19
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 2,156×
- Gina Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, Teamsters Local 237/i.b.t, Docket No. 04-2531-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-07-19· cited 309×
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-12· cited 220×
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-03· cited 212×
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-30· cited 186×
- Brittell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-09-22· cited 124×
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 103×
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 100×
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-25· cited 84×
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-18· cited 77×
- Malasky v. Metal Products Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-03-11· cited 72×
- Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-08· cited 67×
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-06· cited 60×
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-05· cited 54×
- City of Hartford v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 760Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-18· cited 47×
- Votre v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 41×
- Martinez v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-08· cited 41×
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-12-18· cited 35×
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 27×
- Simmons v. ParizekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1969-06-17· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.