Conboy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting ‘‘well established notion that, in determining whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction, every presumption favoring jurisdiction should be indulged’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing trial court’s responsibility to conduct evidentiary hearing when “jurisdictional determination is dependent on the resolution of a critical factual dispute” or is “intertwined with the merits of the case”
• explaining that, ‘‘depending on the state of the record at the time the motion [to dismiss] is filed,’’ court properly may decide motion on basis of ‘‘(1) the complaint alone; (2) the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts evidenced in the record; or (3
• describing procedures for addressing jurisdictional challenge depending on point at which issue raised
• trial court properly considered allegations of complaint and facts contained in record in denying motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• trial court properly considered allegations of complaint and facts contained in record in denying motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).