United States v. Anna Trujillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s motion for substitution of counsel was untimely when it was raised only three days prior to the start of the trial
• concluding that the prosecution's reference to certain facts was improper because “it violated the district court’s pre-trial order’
• holding that because Trujillo failed to “lodge a timely objection to the district court’s failure to instruct the jury contemporaneously with the admission of the Rule 404(b) evidence,” reversal was warranted only upon a finding of plain error
• finding that a motion for substitution of counsel filed three days before the start of trial was untimely
• deciding the premotive issue 21 “[b]ased upon [their] review of the record”
• setting forth that aggregated harmless errors require reversal in situations where “the combined effect . . . was to prejudicial as to render [a] trial fundamentally unfair”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).