Indiana Supreme Court· 6/21/2012

Ward v. State

Citations

969 N.E.2d 46
2012 WL 2361591
2012 Ind. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Noting that “[i]ssues available on direct appeal but not raised are waived, while issues litigated adversely to the defendant are res judicata.”
applying the Guidelines in concluding “that the scope of counsel’s investigation was reasonable”
“Issues available on direct appeal but not raised are waived, while issues litigated adversely to the defendant are res judicata.”
“[I]n certain limited circumstances of extreme magnitude, prejudice to a criminal defendant is so likely that an inquiry into counsel’s actual performance is not required.”
“The scope of the relief available is limited to issues that were not known at the time of the original trial or that were not available on direct appeal.”
\Issues available on direct appeal but not raised are waived.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Dickson, Rucker, David, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.