Texas Commission of Appeals· 1/11/1922
Ward v. Scarborough
Citations
- 236 S.W. 434
- 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The restraint must be imminent and such as to destroy free agency without present means of protection.\
- “The restraint must be imminent and such as to destroy free agency without present means of protection.”
- “The restraint must be imminent and such as to destroy free agency without present means of protection.”
- A Duress of property cannot exist without there being a threat to do something which the threatening party has no legal right to do B some illegal exaction or some fraud or deception. @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Entered, Gallagher, Recommended, Supreme, Will
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sudan v. SudanTexas Supreme Court· 2006-06-30· cited 662×
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 315×
- Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court· 2005-12-02· cited 196×
- Likover v. Sunflower Terrace II, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-08-22· cited 96×
- Dale v. SimonTexas Commission of Appeals· 1924-12-20· cited 75×
- Wright v. SydowTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-24· cited 69×
- First Texas Savings Ass'n of Dallas v. Dicker Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-12· cited 54×
- Tower Contracting Co., Inc. of Tex. v. Burden Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-22· cited 31×
- Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. FaulhaberCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1960-07-15· cited 31×
- Sudan v. SudanTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-09-30· cited 27×
- Spring Branch Bank v. MengdenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-31· cited 18×
- Ginther v. TaubCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-08-24· cited 15×
- Lawrence v. JM Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-05-18· cited 13×
- Hill v. StampfliTexas Commission of Appeals· 1927-01-19· cited 12×
- Cleburne State Bank v. EzellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1934-12-06· cited 12×
- Robertson v. LeeTexas Commission of Appeals· 1923-02-28· cited 11×
- Trigg v. SheltonTexas Commission of Appeals· 1923-02-21· cited 7×
- Smith v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1946-02-20· cited 6×
- Stevenson v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1950-05-12· cited 5×
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1936-10-09· cited 5×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oliphant v. MarkhamTexas Supreme Court· 1891-02-10· cited 63×
- Landa v. ObertTexas Supreme Court· 1890-06-24· cited 50×
- Taylor v. HallTexas Supreme Court· 1888-06-15· cited 35×
- State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1889-06-07· cited 30×
- De Graff v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1891-06-11· cited 23×
- Whitcomb v. HarrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1897-04-15· cited 11×
- Mearkle v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-11-29· cited 9×
- Lappin v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-06-08· cited 4×
- Klein v. BayerMichigan Supreme Court· 1890-06-06· cited 2×
Other cases named Ward v. Scarborough
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.