· 11/24/2004
Wright v. Sydow
Citations
- 173 S.W.3d 534
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 10541
- 2004 WL 3153293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that assignments violated “strong public policy of this State” and were thus void
- stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
- stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
- stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
- noting that the assignment in that case “would incite litigation rather than settling it” and would “produce disharmony and ill will rather than peace”
- noting that when the courts can provide the victim adequate protection, there is no duress
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.