Skip to main content
· 11/24/2004

Wright v. Sydow

Citations

  • 173 S.W.3d 534
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 10541
  • 2004 WL 3153293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that assignments violated “strong public policy of this State” and were thus void
  • stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
  • stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
  • stating that while court may take Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct as expression of public policy, they are not required to do so
  • noting that the assignment in that case “would incite litigation rather than settling it” and would “produce disharmony and ill will rather than peace”
  • noting that when the courts can provide the victim adequate protection, there is no duress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanda McKee Fowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.