Skip to main content
· 6/10/2008

Wanner v. Hutchcroft

Citations

  • 888 N.E.2d 260
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1240
  • 2008 WL 2346131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that even where trial court properly sets aside value of premarital assets to one spouse, appreciation of assets over course of marriage is divisible marital asset
  • observing that, even where the trial court properly sets aside the value of premarital assets to one spouse, the appreciation over the course of the marriage is a divisible marital asset
  • concluding unequal division inappropriate where “[Husband] did not offer documentary exhibits or other evidence” but “merely requested that the trial court set aside to him the entire current value of the marital residence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Friedlander, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.