Craig Randolph v. Karen A Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that dismissal on grounds of political question doctrine does not fall within collateral order doctrine
• noting that “courts give deference ... when the Executive reasonably explains that adjudication of a particular civil lawsuit would adversely affect the foreign policy interests of the United States”
• noting that, had the Executive “requested dismissal of the action,” the separation-of- powers issue “would have been before the district court” in the first instance
• stating that mandamus is \an extraordinary remedy reserved for really extraordinary - cases\
• stating that mandamus is \an extraordinary remedy reserved for really extraordinary cases\
• stating that mandamus is \an extraordinary remedy reserved for really extraordinary cases\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).