Skip to main content

Walters v. Walters

Citations

  • 60 V.I. 768
  • 2014 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order “dismissing the case with prejudice ended the litigation on the merits” and constitutes a final order
  • holding that predictions of the District Court of the Virgin Islands as to ho w the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands might rule are not binding on the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands
  • affirming denial of motion to disqualify because movant “simply made a naked claim” of bias “supported solely by unsubstantiated allegations” and without providing facts
  • “[W]e recently explained [in Connor] that the Superior Court is not bound by this Court’s ‘prior erroneous reliance’ on 1 V.I.C. § 4.”
  • “This citation to the Restatement [in a prior case] was not necessary to the result in that case, and therefore was merely dictum.”
  • “Although ‘unswom representations of an attorney are not evidence,’ Henry v. Dennery, 55 V.1. 986, 994 (V.I. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.