Reese v. Herbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]pplication of [a local rule] does not, however, automatically entitle the movant to summary judgment”
• holding that, “after deeming the movant’s statement of undisputed facts to be admitted pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, the district court must then review the movant’s citations to the record to determine if there is, indeed, no genuine issue of material fact”
• stating that, where the non-movant fails to comply with Local Rule 56.1, the court still must “review the movant’s citations to the record to determine if there is, indeed, no genuine issue of material fact”
• affirming the district court’s exclusion of an expert report for failure to comply with Rule 26
• affirming district court’s grant of a motion to strike an affidavit
• When party has failed to comply with Local Rule 56.1, “the court has before it the functional analog of an unopposed motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).