Eleventh Circuit· 5/16/2008

Reese v. Herbert

Citations

527 F.3d 1253
70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 838
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10545
2008 WL 2066521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[a]pplication of [a local rule] does not, however, automatically entitle the movant to summary judgment”
holding that, “after deeming the movant’s statement of undisputed facts to be admitted pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, the district court must then review the movant’s citations to the record to determine if there is, indeed, no genuine issue of material fact”
stating that, where the non-movant fails to comply with Local Rule 56.1, the court still must “review the movant’s citations to the record to determine if there is, indeed, no genuine issue of material fact”
affirming the district court’s exclusion of an expert report for failure to comply with Rule 26
affirming district court’s grant of a motion to strike an affidavit
When party has failed to comply with Local Rule 56.1, “the court has before it the functional analog of an unopposed motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Black, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.