Walsh v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error. Prejudice must appear affirmatively from the record.” (citation omitted)
• “Not all errors in the superior court warrant reversal []. We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error. Prejudice must appear affirmatively from the record.”
• a court abuses its discretion if it commits a substantial error of law
• “[W]hen [a] professional continues to practice after [a] divorce, the professional may realize value as a direct result of his or her future efforts. That value is nothing more than future income, and cannot be divided.”
• describing two- step process for modifying based on changed circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nia v. Nia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-06-15· cited 44×
• Nash v. Nash
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-23· cited 30×
• In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-09-05
• Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-11-20

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-07· cited 183×
• State v. Hansen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-30· cited 146×
• In Re Marriage of Lucas
  California Supreme Court· 1980-08-07· cited 141×
• Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook Yoon
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 133×
• Dugan v. Dugan
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-02-28· cited 114×
• City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-02· cited 111×
• FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-04-30· cited 106×
• In Re Marriage of Aufmuth
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-02-20· cited 85×
• Kelsey v. Kelsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-09· cited 68×
• Wisner v. Wisner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-03-19· cited 63×
• Hrudka v. Hrudka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 61×
• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 50×
• May v. May
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 47×
• Hetherington v. Hetherington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-06-19· cited 30×
• In Re Marriage of Molloy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-06-09· cited 28×
• In Re Marriage of Fenton
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-07-30· cited 20×
• Matter of Marriage of Reiling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-12-21· cited 18×
• Buttram v. Buttram
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-01· cited 18×
• Hollander v. Hollander
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-01· cited 18×
• Levy v. Levy
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-12-06· cited 17×