Eighth Circuit· 6/15/1988
Wallace v. Dorsey Trailers Southeast, Inc.
Citations
- 849 F.2d 341
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that entry of summary judgment was not premature in view of nonmovants failure to take advantage of Rule 56(f) or ask the court for any kind of continuance
- holding that entry of summary judgment was not premature in view of nonmovants failure to take advantage of Rule 56(f) or ask the court for any kind of continuance
- affirming district court’s .decision not to impose a duty to retrofit an aerial bucket lift in the absence of a state or federal law requiring the product to be recalled
- under Missouri law, corporate successor liability may attach only where successor acquires all of transfer- or’s assets
- nonmovant's failure to request continuance in order to conduct discovery means court's entry of summary judgment prior to discovery is not premature; if party believes pertinent evidence remains undiscovered, party should make some effort to obtain it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bright, Gibson, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-16· cited 195×
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-09-15· cited 141×
- Timothy J. Dropinski v. Douglas County, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of NebraskaEighth Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 83×
- Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 78×
- Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-10-29· cited 68×
- Dennis Epps v. The City of Pine LawnEighth Circuit· 2003-12-19· cited 62×
- McCarthy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-07· cited 50×
- Soo Line Railroad Ex Rel. Minnesota v. B.J. Carney & Co.D. Minnesota· 1992-06-23· cited 35×
- National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1995-07-14· cited 34×
- Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-04· cited 33×
- Morrison v. Kubota Tractor Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-12-27· cited 32×
- Romero v. International Harvester Co.Tenth Circuit· 1992-11-18· cited 25×
- Butler v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.W.D. Virginia· 1991-10-18· cited 23×
- Johnston v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-04-09· cited 18×
- Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2009-05-05· cited 17×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,556 Diana K. Sherlock v. Quality Control Equipment Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1996-05-10· cited 16×
- Davidson v. Besser Co.E.D. Missouri· 1999-10-15· cited 3×
- Gorsuch v. Formtek Metal Forming, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2011-03-25· cited 3×
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson-Ceco Corp.D. Vermont· 1995-03-14· cited 2×
- Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Burlington Northern RailroadD. Minnesota· 1990-09-11· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowEighth Circuit· 1987-08-07· cited 320×
- Clarence Tucker, Jr. And Jean Tucker v. Paxson MacHine Company, William Thropp & Sons Company, Division of J.M.L. Trading CorporationEighth Circuit· 1981-04-08· cited 89×
- A. D. Luster, A's Fishhouses, Inc. v. Retail Credit CompanyEighth Circuit· 1978-06-07· cited 45×
- Keller v. International Harvester Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-03-01· cited 34×
- Brockmann v. O'NEILLMissouri Court of Appeals· 1978-04-25· cited 32×
- Kansas City Power and Light Company v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyEighth Circuit· 1983-06-03· cited 25×
- Young v. Fulton Iron Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-04-28· cited 23×
- Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark v. Bauer Dental Studio, Inc. And Dailey Dental, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1986-11-14· cited 17×
- Stark v. St. Cloud State UniversityEighth Circuit· 1986-10-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.