· 8/5/2002
Timothy J. Dropinski v. Douglas County, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska
Citations
- 298 F.3d 704
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15544
- 2002 WL 1784272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a discussion of the interactive process is \superfluous\ where the worker cannot perform the essential job duties, and any accommodation would result in job restructuring
- holding that where requested accommodation would impose undue burden on employer, discussion of whether employer properly engaged in interactive process was “superfluous”
- holding that a discussion of the interactive process is “superfluous” where the worker cannot perform the essential job duties, and any accommodation would result in job restructuring
- noting that function may be considered essential even though there may not be a significant amount of time performing the task routinely
- stating that if the plaintiff proved only lifting restriction, it \might\ not be enough to establish disability
- stating that when an employer disputes allegations that a plaintiff can perform the essential functions of a job, the employer must present evidence establishing those functions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Beam, Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.