Skip to main content
· 8/5/2002

Timothy J. Dropinski v. Douglas County, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 704
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15544
  • 2002 WL 1784272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a discussion of the interactive process is \superfluous\ where the worker cannot perform the essential job duties, and any accommodation would result in job restructuring
  • holding that where requested accommodation would impose undue burden on employer, discussion of whether employer properly engaged in interactive process was “superfluous”
  • holding that a discussion of the interactive process is “superfluous” where the worker cannot perform the essential job duties, and any accommodation would result in job restructuring
  • noting that function may be considered essential even though there may not be a significant amount of time performing the task routinely
  • stating that if the plaintiff proved only lifting restriction, it \might\ not be enough to establish disability
  • stating that when an employer disputes allegations that a plaintiff can perform the essential functions of a job, the employer must present evidence establishing those functions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Beam, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.