Skip to main content

Walker v. Walker

Citations

  • 523 A.2d 782
  • 362 Pa. Super. 75
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that non-party against whom relief was sought was a party under 42 Pa.C.S. § 102 for purposes of standing
  • finding that an appellant who was “not a named party” in a custody action qualified as an “aggrieved party” under Rule 501 due to her participation and “indispensable” involvement in the case
  • allowing nonparty to appeal because she participated in the proceedings below and was aggrieved by the trial court's order
  • although not named as a party, the daughter-appellant was deemed to have standing to appeal because she participated in the trial court action and relief was sought against her
  • order in the course of a custody dispute directing daughter to visit mother, to undergo a psychological examination and to attend family counseling held to be an appealable collateral order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Rowley, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.