Fenstamaker v. Fenstamaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fine of $1000.00 imposed upon finding of civil contempt was not abuse of discretion in view of contemnor’s sizeable assets
• holding that the issue raised on appeal, whether the procedural requirements for an adjudication of contempt were met, which was not raised during contempt proceedings in the trial court, was waived
• holding that the issue raised on appeal, whether the procedural requirements for an adjudication of contempt were met, which was not raised during contempt proceedings in the trial court, was waived
• sanction imposed upon finding of civil contempt was not abuse of discretion in light of contemnor’s sizeable assets
• sanction imposed upon finding of civil contempt was not abuse of discretion in light of contemnor's sizeable assets
• no order, decree or subpoena was directed to appellant, and, therefore, he could not be punished for direct criminal contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).