Walker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To succeed, the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the [applicant] unreasonably delayed in seeking relief and that the State was prejudiced by the delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-07· cited 49×
• McCorker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-10-16· cited 41×
• Raso v. Wall
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-08-23· cited 38×
• Pinkins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-08· cited 37×
• Higgins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-21· cited 18×
• Walker v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-10-04· cited 8×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• Francis v. Franklin
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
• Dill v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-02-07· cited 155×
• Benefiel v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 70×
• Pruitt v. Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-20· cited 40×
• Swallows v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 35×
• Robey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-10-24· cited 26×
• Sanders v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-03-06· cited 23×
• Geiger v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-12-28· cited 21×
• Moody v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-14· cited 21×
• Mickens v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-08-06· cited 20×
• Clark v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-04· cited 18×
• Lile v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-10· cited 17×