McCorker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding any error resulting from defendant not being allowed to cross-examine State’s witness for bias harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of cross-examination defendant conducted and substantial cumulative evidence
• finding similar accomplice liability language to be permissible when the same instruction also contained language requiring a finding of specific intent
• substantial cumulative evidence independent of the evidence at issue renders the court’s admission of such evidence harmless
• substantial cumulative evidence independent of the evidence at issue renders the court's admission of such evidence harmless
• “The full extent of the benefit offered to a witness is relevant to the jury’s determination of the weight and credibility of the witness’s testimony.”
• substantial cumulative evidence from other witnesses renders the court’s evidentiary decision harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).